Author Avatar

editor

0

Share post:

Bitqyck, Bruce Bise and Samuel Mendez co-founders were each given a 50-month jail term.

Following their refusal to file Bitqyck’s taxes in 2016 and 2017, the IRS opened a criminal investigation into the couple.

The prosecution of Bise and Mendez is a classic MLM crypto heist;

Bitqyck raised about $24 million from more than 13,000 investors, according to Mr. Bise and Mr. Mendez.

The defendants utilized Bitqyck cash for personal needs such as casino vacations, automobiles, opulent house furnishings, art, and rent instead of keeping their obligations to these investors.

Mr. Bise and Mr. Mendez earned around $4.68 million and $4.48 million respectively from 2016 to 2018.

On the tax front, it was the failure to file with the IRS that caused problems.

Mr. Bise underreported his income to the IRS for the years 2016 and 2017, which resulted in a $371,278 tax loss. Mr. Mendez also underreported his income to the IRS for that period, which resulted in a $311,155 tax loss.

Despite receiving more than $3.5 million from investors in 2018, Bitqyck did not submit any company tax filings at all.

Together, Mr. Bise and Mr. Mendez have incurred a tax loss of more than $1.6 million to the United States government.

In August 2021, a criminal complaint was filed against Bise and Mendez.

In September 2021, Bise admitted confessed to tax fraud. Later, in October, Mendez entered a guilty plea. In March, the two were given a 50-month jail term.

I waited to report the situation since I was unaware of it.

In March 2017, BehindMLM wrote a review on Bitqyck. In our analysis, we determined that the securities scam Mendez and Bice began with Calorchi and continued with Bitqyck.

In 2019, the SEC filed a lawsuit against Bitqyck, Mendez, and Bice, at first estimating $13 million in customer damages.

As a result of the IRS’s inquiry, that sum would rise to $24 million that had been stolen from 13,000 investors.

According to the SEC’s complaint, Bise and Mendez fraudulently stated that each Bitqy token delivered fractional shares of Bitqyck stock through a “smart contract” and that QyckDeals, a daily deals platform employing Bitqy, was a worldwide online marketplace.

According to the lawsuit, the defendants misrepresented to investors that BitqyM tokens gave ownership rights to a Bitqyck cryptocurrency mining operation that used electricity at a discounted cost.

Bitqyck didn’t own any mining facilities and didn’t have access to cheap power.

Bitqyck is also accused of operating TradeBQ, an unregistered national security exchange that allowed trading in just one security, Bitqy, unlawfully with the help of its creators.

Mendez and Bice paid $10.1 million to resolve the SEC’s allegations of securities fraud against them, which included disgorgement and two civil penalties.

CompCoin Review - Is a Fraud
OneCoin Review Part 3 - Is a Fraud

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *