Author Avatar



Share post:

An injunction against Paparazzi’s former employees and consultants has been granted.

Former employees Melissa Sorenson and Geraldine Souza, according to Paparazzi’s original lawsuit, were attempting to obstruct Paparazzi’s efforts to stop them.

Kimberly Drewry, Morgan Ferguson, Jaime Robinson, Jaime Dyer, Kylee Robinette, Morgan Dyer, and Jennifer Dyer from exposing private information.

According to the paparazzi, Unauthorized access was how Sorenson initially obtained and then continued to obtain its private information. A FaceBook group operated by ex-distributors was subsequently created by Sorenson, and the material was shared there.

On May 20th, an injunction hearing was convened after a Temporary Restraining Order was obtained.

The court granted Paparazzi’s motion for a preliminary injunction because all of the defendants except Burgess were present and none of them had legal representation.

To summarize the reasons behind the court’s ruling, we may say that:

Paparazzi has demonstrated a high likelihood of success on the merits of its breach of contract claim, which provides the basis for preliminary injunctive relief, after analyzing its claims in its submission and at the Hearing, as well as the Defendants’ answers.

In the case of Paparazzi, the probability of irreparable injury has been proven.

Because paparazzi’s confidential information has been leaked and circulated, there is a pressing need to take action.

After it’s been shared, it’s extremely difficult to reclaim sensitive information. Paparazzi has suffered irreparable reputational harm as a result of Defendants’ unauthorized dissemination of Confidential Information.

Customers and Consultants are losing faith in Paparazzi’s business reputation as a result of Paparazzi’s proprietary Confidential Information being used by rivals, and Paparazzi’s Consultants have a serious risk of terminating their ties with Paparazzi.

A Confidentiality Agreement between Paparazzi and Sorenson was signed to preserve Paparazzi’s Confidential Information and company.

Contract rights, especially confidentiality agreements, are important to the general public’s well-being, hence they should be upheld.

Additionally, the general public cares deeply about the security of private company data and the good name of companies.

If Paparazzi is granted injunctive relief, this is a plus for them.

Permanently enforcing an earlier TRO is now possible thanks to the granted preliminary injunction.

Furthermore, the defendants cannot access Paparazzi’s private information and distribute it or discuss it, as stated in the indictment.

There will almost certainly be some sort of settlement announcement given that the defendants don’t appear to be interested in fighting the case. This case isn’t going to trial, in my opinion.

Updated on June 20th, 2022 – The court set a trial date for October 16th, 2023 on June 10th, pending any changes before then.

Even though I have yet to see this one go to trial, it is the most recent development.

Sytrex Trade Review - Is a Fraud
Forsage Review Part 2 - Is a Fraud

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *